1. Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
- Posted by Grape Vine <g__vine at hotmail.com>
Feb 01, 2001
-
Last edited Feb 02, 2001
I have Eu for Linux installed on my shell,
Most text apps seam to run fine, tho
majorly slow. All i want to do(for now)
Is create a IRC client that only joins
the channels in a list(Prob store list in
a file).
Grape Vine
13728824
2. Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
At 07:52 PM 2/1/01 -0800, Grape Vine wrote:
>I have Eu for Linux installed on my shell,
>Most text apps seam to run fine, tho
>majorly slow. ...
Something may be wrong with your setup - for me, Eu Linux text apps run
somewhat faster than under dos, using the same (multi-boot) pc. Assuming,
of course, that your Lunux box isn't loaded down by numerous users or busy
serving lots of web pages.
Regards,
Irv
3. Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
I need to be a little clear on what i meant
I have a remote linux shell that i use
that with a slow data connection makes it very slow
Any advise or help on using tcp/ip on linux?
Ill have a local Linux setup again as soon as i
get Debian, Open is bloatware like Windows and RH
seams to be picky(prob just me)
Grape
>From: IRv <irv.mullins at eudoramail.com>
>Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
>To: EUforum at topica.com
>Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
>Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 06:30:30 -0800
>
>At 07:52 PM 2/1/01 -0800, Grape Vine wrote:
>>I have Eu for Linux installed on my shell,
>>Most text apps seam to run fine, tho
>>majorly slow. ...
>
>Something may be wrong with your setup - for me, Eu Linux text apps run
>somewhat faster than under dos, using the same (multi-boot) pc. Assuming,
>of course, that your Lunux box isn't loaded down by numerous users or busy
>serving lots of web pages.
>
>Regards,
>Irv
>
>
4. Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
- Posted by Irv <irv.mullins at eudoramail.com>
Feb 02, 2001
-
Last edited Feb 03, 2001
At 10:39 AM 2/2/01 -0800, Grape Vine wrote:
>I need to be a little clear on what i meant
>I have a remote linux shell that i use
>that with a slow data connection makes it very slow
Don't know if anything can be done about the slow data connection.
I use 100Mbps fast ethernet cards in my home lan, so I don't really see any
difference between local and network transactions.
>Any advise or help on using tcp/ip on linux?
>Ill have a local Linux setup again as soon as i
>get Debian, Open is bloatware like Windows and RH
>seams to be picky(prob just me)
Not just you. The most stable and easiest to set up complete
Linux distribution, in my opinion, is SuSE, followed by Mandrake
(if you're using Pentiums) and then Slack. Didn't like Red Hat at all, and
I've heard the same thing from others.
Regards,
Irv
5. Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
- Posted by Grape Vine <g__vine at hotmail.com>
Feb 02, 2001
-
Last edited Feb 03, 2001
I dont realy need anything done about the slow connection
I dont plan on using the shell for anything other then
a stable tcp/ip link to dalnet, keep my channels open
a topic set. LAter i might do more.
>From: Irv <irv.mullins at eudoramail.com>
>Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
>To: EUforum at topica.com
>Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
>Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 19:44:55 -0800
>
>At 10:39 AM 2/2/01 -0800, Grape Vine wrote:
>
>>I need to be a little clear on what i meant
>>I have a remote linux shell that i use
>>that with a slow data connection makes it very slow
>
>Don't know if anything can be done about the slow data connection.
>I use 100Mbps fast ethernet cards in my home lan, so I don't really see any
>difference between local and network transactions.
>
>>Any advise or help on using tcp/ip on linux?
>>Ill have a local Linux setup again as soon as i
>>get Debian, Open is bloatware like Windows and RH
>>seams to be picky(prob just me)
>
>Not just you. The most stable and easiest to set up complete
>Linux distribution, in my opinion, is SuSE, followed by Mandrake
>(if you're using Pentiums) and then Slack. Didn't like Red Hat at all, and
>I've heard the same thing from others.
>
>Regards,
>Irv
>
6. Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
- Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
Feb 02, 2001
-
Last edited Feb 03, 2001
On 2 Feb 2001, at 19:59, Grape Vine wrote:
> I dont realy need anything done about the slow connection
> I dont plan on using the shell for anything other then
> a stable tcp/ip link to dalnet, keep my channels open
> a topic set. LAter i might do more.
Lmao, dalnet?? Is there a *less* stable net? Even if you are connected, as much
as
they are DDoS'd and split, there is no telling if you get chanserv, or for that
matter, any
other server on the net! Why don't you let chanserv keep the topic and not worry
about
stability, cause there is no stability on the net, it's an illusion. Or go
shopping for a
better shell host.
On a good note, there is a conference in Oz on net connections, and a paper is
being
delivered by one of the originators of the XML "standard" (and author of several
massive
books) about something i pestered dalnet and sorcerynet on for years: an ircd
that
uses a hypercube topology and slave *servs in the ircd. Naturally, he will get
the credit
for continually bringing up the topic, not me. <sigh>
Kat
> >From: Irv <irv.mullins at eudoramail.com>
> >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> >To: EUforum at topica.com
> >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 19:44:55 -0800
> >
> >At 10:39 AM 2/2/01 -0800, Grape Vine wrote:
> >
> >>I need to be a little clear on what i meant
> >>I have a remote linux shell that i use
> >>that with a slow data connection makes it very slow
> >
> >Don't know if anything can be done about the slow data connection.
> >I use 100Mbps fast ethernet cards in my home lan, so I don't really see any
> >difference between local and network transactions.
> >
> >>Any advise or help on using tcp/ip on linux?
> >>Ill have a local Linux setup again as soon as i
> >>get Debian, Open is bloatware like Windows and RH
> >>seams to be picky(prob just me)
> >
> >Not just you. The most stable and easiest to set up complete
> >Linux distribution, in my opinion, is SuSE, followed by Mandrake
> >(if you're using Pentiums) and then Slack. Didn't like Red Hat at all, and
> >I've heard the same thing from others.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Irv
> >
>
>
7. Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
Hehe, Ya everyone tells me dalnet is no
place to use abot. I use dalnet all the
time(if i am online i am on dallnet)
So it will be where i test the bot
I want to expland the bot to be a game
bot and maybe a chatter bot. Yea some
people hate that but Its mainly for ~me~
so it doesnt matter. About netsplits,
thats easy to take care of, make the bot
spaw a copy and hop on the other side
of the split, with a diff nick.
>From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
>Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
>To: EUforum at topica.com
>Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
>Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 20:23:12 -0800
>
>On 2 Feb 2001, at 19:59, Grape Vine wrote:
>
> > I dont realy need anything done about the slow connection
> > I dont plan on using the shell for anything other then
> > a stable tcp/ip link to dalnet, keep my channels open
> > a topic set. LAter i might do more.
>
>Lmao, dalnet?? Is there a *less* stable net? Even if you are connected, as
>much as
>they are DDoS'd and split, there is no telling if you get chanserv, or for
>that matter, any
>other server on the net! Why don't you let chanserv keep the topic and not
>worry about
>stability, cause there is no stability on the net, it's an illusion. Or go
>shopping for a
>better shell host.
>
>On a good note, there is a conference in Oz on net connections, and a paper
>is being
>delivered by one of the originators of the XML "standard" (and author of
>several massive
>books) about something i pestered dalnet and sorcerynet on for years: an
>ircd that
>uses a hypercube topology and slave *servs in the ircd. Naturally, he will
>get the credit
>for continually bringing up the topic, not me. <sigh>
>
>Kat
>
>
> > >From: Irv <irv.mullins at eudoramail.com>
> > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > >To: EUforum at topica.com
> > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> > >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 19:44:55 -0800
> > >
> > >At 10:39 AM 2/2/01 -0800, Grape Vine wrote:
> > >
> > >>I need to be a little clear on what i meant
> > >>I have a remote linux shell that i use
> > >>that with a slow data connection makes it very slow
> > >
> > >Don't know if anything can be done about the slow data connection.
> > >I use 100Mbps fast ethernet cards in my home lan, so I don't really see
>any
> > >difference between local and network transactions.
> > >
> > >>Any advise or help on using tcp/ip on linux?
> > >>Ill have a local Linux setup again as soon as i
> > >>get Debian, Open is bloatware like Windows and RH
> > >>seams to be picky(prob just me)
> > >
> > >Not just you. The most stable and easiest to set up complete
> > >Linux distribution, in my opinion, is SuSE, followed by Mandrake
> > >(if you're using Pentiums) and then Slack. Didn't like Red Hat at all,
>and
> > >I've heard the same thing from others.
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Irv
> > >
> >
>
>
8. Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
On 3 Feb 2001, at 7:55, Grape Vine wrote:
> Hehe, Ya everyone tells me dalnet is no
> place to use abot. I use dalnet all the
> time(if i am online i am on dallnet)
> So it will be where i test the bot
> I want to expland the bot to be a game
> bot and maybe a chatter bot. Yea some
> people hate that but Its mainly for ~me~
> so it doesnt matter. About netsplits,
> thats easy to take care of, make the bot
> spaw a copy and hop on the other side
> of the split, with a diff nick.
So the bot is constantly doing /links and comparing that with a list of what it
should
be? ouch.
Kat
>
>
> >From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
> >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> >To: EUforum at topica.com
> >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 20:23:12 -0800
> >
> >On 2 Feb 2001, at 19:59, Grape Vine wrote:
> >
> > > I dont realy need anything done about the slow connection
> > > I dont plan on using the shell for anything other then
> > > a stable tcp/ip link to dalnet, keep my channels open
> > > a topic set. LAter i might do more.
> >
> >Lmao, dalnet?? Is there a *less* stable net? Even if you are connected, as
> >much as
> >they are DDoS'd and split, there is no telling if you get chanserv, or for
> >that matter, any
> >other server on the net! Why don't you let chanserv keep the topic and not
> >worry about
> >stability, cause there is no stability on the net, it's an illusion. Or go
> >shopping for a
> >better shell host.
> >
> >On a good note, there is a conference in Oz on net connections, and a paper
> >is being
> >delivered by one of the originators of the XML "standard" (and author of
> >several massive
> >books) about something i pestered dalnet and sorcerynet on for years: an
> >ircd that
> >uses a hypercube topology and slave *servs in the ircd. Naturally, he will
> >get the credit
> >for continually bringing up the topic, not me. <sigh>
> >
> >Kat
> >
> >
> > > >From: Irv <irv.mullins at eudoramail.com>
> > > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > >To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> > > >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 19:44:55 -0800
> > > >
> > > >At 10:39 AM 2/2/01 -0800, Grape Vine wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>I need to be a little clear on what i meant
> > > >>I have a remote linux shell that i use
> > > >>that with a slow data connection makes it very slow
> > > >
> > > >Don't know if anything can be done about the slow data connection.
> > > >I use 100Mbps fast ethernet cards in my home lan, so I don't really see
> >any
> > > >difference between local and network transactions.
> > > >
> > > >>Any advise or help on using tcp/ip on linux?
> > > >>Ill have a local Linux setup again as soon as i
> > > >>get Debian, Open is bloatware like Windows and RH
> > > >>seams to be picky(prob just me)
> > > >
> > > >Not just you. The most stable and easiest to set up complete
> > > >Linux distribution, in my opinion, is SuSE, followed by Mandrake
> > > >(if you're using Pentiums) and then Slack. Didn't like Red Hat at all,
> >and
> > > >I've heard the same thing from others.
> > > >
> > > >Regards,
> > > >Irv
> > > >
> > > Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
> > > http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
9. Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
Nope, i found a way that is easy,
Or at least it looks easy. When a
netsplit does happen irc tells you
where it happens, If my bot see's it
(and only if it see's it) It hop's
on the other side of the split
This way the bot only need to worry
about splits when it affects it
Grape
>From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
>Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
>To: EUforum at topica.com
>Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
>Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 10:15:35 -0800
>
>On 3 Feb 2001, at 7:55, Grape Vine wrote:
>
> > Hehe, Ya everyone tells me dalnet is no
> > place to use abot. I use dalnet all the
> > time(if i am online i am on dallnet)
> > So it will be where i test the bot
> > I want to expland the bot to be a game
> > bot and maybe a chatter bot. Yea some
> > people hate that but Its mainly for ~me~
> > so it doesnt matter. About netsplits,
> > thats easy to take care of, make the bot
> > spaw a copy and hop on the other side
> > of the split, with a diff nick.
>
>So the bot is constantly doing /links and comparing that with a list of
>what it should
>be? ouch.
>
>Kat
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > >From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
> > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > >To: EUforum at topica.com
> > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> > >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 20:23:12 -0800
> > >
> > >On 2 Feb 2001, at 19:59, Grape Vine wrote:
> > >
> > > > I dont realy need anything done about the slow connection
> > > > I dont plan on using the shell for anything other then
> > > > a stable tcp/ip link to dalnet, keep my channels open
> > > > a topic set. LAter i might do more.
> > >
> > >Lmao, dalnet?? Is there a *less* stable net? Even if you are connected,
>as
> > >much as
> > >they are DDoS'd and split, there is no telling if you get chanserv, or
>for
> > >that matter, any
> > >other server on the net! Why don't you let chanserv keep the topic and
>not
> > >worry about
> > >stability, cause there is no stability on the net, it's an illusion. Or
>go
> > >shopping for a
> > >better shell host.
> > >
> > >On a good note, there is a conference in Oz on net connections, and a
>paper
> > >is being
> > >delivered by one of the originators of the XML "standard" (and author
>of
> > >several massive
> > >books) about something i pestered dalnet and sorcerynet on for years:
>an
> > >ircd that
> > >uses a hypercube topology and slave *servs in the ircd. Naturally, he
>will
> > >get the credit
> > >for continually bringing up the topic, not me. <sigh>
> > >
> > >Kat
> > >
> > >
> > > > >From: Irv <irv.mullins at eudoramail.com>
> > > > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > > >To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> > > > >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 19:44:55 -0800
> > > > >
> > > > >At 10:39 AM 2/2/01 -0800, Grape Vine wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >>I need to be a little clear on what i meant
> > > > >>I have a remote linux shell that i use
> > > > >>that with a slow data connection makes it very slow
> > > > >
> > > > >Don't know if anything can be done about the slow data connection.
> > > > >I use 100Mbps fast ethernet cards in my home lan, so I don't really
>see
> > >any
> > > > >difference between local and network transactions.
> > > > >
> > > > >>Any advise or help on using tcp/ip on linux?
> > > > >>Ill have a local Linux setup again as soon as i
> > > > >>get Debian, Open is bloatware like Windows and RH
> > > > >>seams to be picky(prob just me)
> > > > >
> > > > >Not just you. The most stable and easiest to set up complete
> > > > >Linux distribution, in my opinion, is SuSE, followed by Mandrake
> > > > >(if you're using Pentiums) and then Slack. Didn't like Red Hat at
>all,
> > >and
> > > > >I've heard the same thing from others.
> > > > >
> > > > >Regards,
> > > > >Irv
> > > > >
> > > > Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
> > > > http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
10. Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
On 3 Feb 2001, at 14:24, Grape Vine wrote:
>
>
> Nope, i found a way that is easy,
> Or at least it looks easy. When a
> netsplit does happen irc tells you
> where it happens,
Only if someone in your channel is split off, then it tells you. If no one in
your channel
is split, then every other server on the net can split, and you'll never know
it.
Kat
> If my bot see's it
> (and only if it see's it) It hop's
> on the other side of the split
> This way the bot only need to worry
> about splits when it affects it
>
> Grape
>
> >From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
> >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> >To: EUforum at topica.com
> >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> >Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 10:15:35 -0800
> >
> >On 3 Feb 2001, at 7:55, Grape Vine wrote:
> >
> > > Hehe, Ya everyone tells me dalnet is no
> > > place to use abot. I use dalnet all the
> > > time(if i am online i am on dallnet)
> > > So it will be where i test the bot
> > > I want to expland the bot to be a game
> > > bot and maybe a chatter bot. Yea some
> > > people hate that but Its mainly for ~me~
> > > so it doesnt matter. About netsplits,
> > > thats easy to take care of, make the bot
> > > spaw a copy and hop on the other side
> > > of the split, with a diff nick.
> >
> >So the bot is constantly doing /links and comparing that with a list of
> >what it should
> >be? ouch.
> >
> >Kat
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
> > > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > >To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> > > >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 20:23:12 -0800
> > > >
> > > >On 2 Feb 2001, at 19:59, Grape Vine wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I dont realy need anything done about the slow connection
> > > > > I dont plan on using the shell for anything other then
> > > > > a stable tcp/ip link to dalnet, keep my channels open
> > > > > a topic set. LAter i might do more.
> > > >
> > > >Lmao, dalnet?? Is there a *less* stable net? Even if you are connected,
> >as
> > > >much as
> > > >they are DDoS'd and split, there is no telling if you get chanserv, or
> >for
> > > >that matter, any
> > > >other server on the net! Why don't you let chanserv keep the topic and
> >not
> > > >worry about
> > > >stability, cause there is no stability on the net, it's an illusion. Or
> >go
> > > >shopping for a
> > > >better shell host.
> > > >
> > > >On a good note, there is a conference in Oz on net connections, and a
> >paper
> > > >is being
> > > >delivered by one of the originators of the XML "standard" (and author
> >of
> > > >several massive
> > > >books) about something i pestered dalnet and sorcerynet on for years:
> >an
> > > >ircd that
> > > >uses a hypercube topology and slave *servs in the ircd. Naturally, he
> >will
> > > >get the credit
> > > >for continually bringing up the topic, not me. <sigh>
> > > >
> > > >Kat
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > >From: Irv <irv.mullins at eudoramail.com>
> > > > > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > > > >To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > > > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> > > > > >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 19:44:55 -0800
> > > > > >
> > > > > >At 10:39 AM 2/2/01 -0800, Grape Vine wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>I need to be a little clear on what i meant
> > > > > >>I have a remote linux shell that i use
> > > > > >>that with a slow data connection makes it very slow
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Don't know if anything can be done about the slow data connection.
> > > > > >I use 100Mbps fast ethernet cards in my home lan, so I don't really
> >see
> > > >any
> > > > > >difference between local and network transactions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>Any advise or help on using tcp/ip on linux?
> > > > > >>Ill have a local Linux setup again as soon as i
> > > > > >>get Debian, Open is bloatware like Windows and RH
> > > > > >>seams to be picky(prob just me)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Not just you. The most stable and easiest to set up complete
> > > > > >Linux distribution, in my opinion, is SuSE, followed by Mandrake
> > > > > >(if you're using Pentiums) and then Slack. Didn't like Red Hat at
> >all,
> > > >and
> > > > > >I've heard the same thing from others.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Regards,
> > > > > >Irv
> > > > > >
> > > > > Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
> > > > > http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
> > > http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
11. Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
- Posted by Grape Vine <g__vine at hotmail.com>
Feb 03, 2001
-
Last edited Feb 04, 2001
I know, And that is the ~only~ time
that my bot should care about a netsplit
(less services are down when the bot loads)
>From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
>Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
>To: EUforum at topica.com
>Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
>Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 16:02:23 -0800
>
>On 3 Feb 2001, at 14:24, Grape Vine wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Nope, i found a way that is easy,
> > Or at least it looks easy. When a
> > netsplit does happen irc tells you
> > where it happens,
>
>Only if someone in your channel is split off, then it tells you. If no one
>in your channel
>is split, then every other server on the net can split, and you'll never
>know it.
>
>Kat
>
>
> > If my bot see's it
> > (and only if it see's it) It hop's
> > on the other side of the split
> > This way the bot only need to worry
> > about splits when it affects it
> >
> > Grape
> >
> > >From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
> > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > >To: EUforum at topica.com
> > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> > >Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 10:15:35 -0800
> > >
> > >On 3 Feb 2001, at 7:55, Grape Vine wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hehe, Ya everyone tells me dalnet is no
> > > > place to use abot. I use dalnet all the
> > > > time(if i am online i am on dallnet)
> > > > So it will be where i test the bot
> > > > I want to expland the bot to be a game
> > > > bot and maybe a chatter bot. Yea some
> > > > people hate that but Its mainly for ~me~
> > > > so it doesnt matter. About netsplits,
> > > > thats easy to take care of, make the bot
> > > > spaw a copy and hop on the other side
> > > > of the split, with a diff nick.
> > >
> > >So the bot is constantly doing /links and comparing that with a list of
> > >what it should
> > >be? ouch.
> > >
> > >Kat
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
> > > > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > > >To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> > > > >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 20:23:12 -0800
> > > > >
> > > > >On 2 Feb 2001, at 19:59, Grape Vine wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I dont realy need anything done about the slow connection
> > > > > > I dont plan on using the shell for anything other then
> > > > > > a stable tcp/ip link to dalnet, keep my channels open
> > > > > > a topic set. LAter i might do more.
> > > > >
> > > > >Lmao, dalnet?? Is there a *less* stable net? Even if you are
>connected,
> > >as
> > > > >much as
> > > > >they are DDoS'd and split, there is no telling if you get chanserv,
>or
> > >for
> > > > >that matter, any
> > > > >other server on the net! Why don't you let chanserv keep the topic
>and
> > >not
> > > > >worry about
> > > > >stability, cause there is no stability on the net, it's an
>illusion. Or
> > >go
> > > > >shopping for a
> > > > >better shell host.
> > > > >
> > > > >On a good note, there is a conference in Oz on net connections, and
>a
> > >paper
> > > > >is being
> > > > >delivered by one of the originators of the XML "standard" (and
>author
> > >of
> > > > >several massive
> > > > >books) about something i pestered dalnet and sorcerynet on for
>years:
> > >an
> > > > >ircd that
> > > > >uses a hypercube topology and slave *servs in the ircd. Naturally,
>he
> > >will
> > > > >get the credit
> > > > >for continually bringing up the topic, not me. <sigh>
> > > > >
> > > > >Kat
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >From: Irv <irv.mullins at eudoramail.com>
> > > > > > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > > > > >To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > > > > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> > > > > > >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 19:44:55 -0800
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >At 10:39 AM 2/2/01 -0800, Grape Vine wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>I need to be a little clear on what i meant
> > > > > > >>I have a remote linux shell that i use
> > > > > > >>that with a slow data connection makes it very slow
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Don't know if anything can be done about the slow data
>connection.
> > > > > > >I use 100Mbps fast ethernet cards in my home lan, so I don't
>really
> > >see
> > > > >any
> > > > > > >difference between local and network transactions.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>Any advise or help on using tcp/ip on linux?
> > > > > > >>Ill have a local Linux setup again as soon as i
> > > > > > >>get Debian, Open is bloatware like Windows and RH
> > > > > > >>seams to be picky(prob just me)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Not just you. The most stable and easiest to set up complete
> > > > > > >Linux distribution, in my opinion, is SuSE, followed by
>Mandrake
> > > > > > >(if you're using Pentiums) and then Slack. Didn't like Red Hat
>at
> > >all,
> > > > >and
> > > > > > >I've heard the same thing from others.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Regards,
> > > > > > >Irv
> > > > > > >
> > > > >http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
>
>
