Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
On 3 Feb 2001, at 7:55, Grape Vine wrote:
> Hehe, Ya everyone tells me dalnet is no
> place to use abot. I use dalnet all the
> time(if i am online i am on dallnet)
> So it will be where i test the bot
> I want to expland the bot to be a game
> bot and maybe a chatter bot. Yea some
> people hate that but Its mainly for ~me~
> so it doesnt matter. About netsplits,
> thats easy to take care of, make the bot
> spaw a copy and hop on the other side
> of the split, with a diff nick.
So the bot is constantly doing /links and comparing that with a list of what it
should
be? ouch.
Kat
>
>
> >From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
> >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> >To: EUforum at topica.com
> >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 20:23:12 -0800
> >
> >On 2 Feb 2001, at 19:59, Grape Vine wrote:
> >
> > > I dont realy need anything done about the slow connection
> > > I dont plan on using the shell for anything other then
> > > a stable tcp/ip link to dalnet, keep my channels open
> > > a topic set. LAter i might do more.
> >
> >Lmao, dalnet?? Is there a *less* stable net? Even if you are connected, as
> >much as
> >they are DDoS'd and split, there is no telling if you get chanserv, or for
> >that matter, any
> >other server on the net! Why don't you let chanserv keep the topic and not
> >worry about
> >stability, cause there is no stability on the net, it's an illusion. Or go
> >shopping for a
> >better shell host.
> >
> >On a good note, there is a conference in Oz on net connections, and a paper
> >is being
> >delivered by one of the originators of the XML "standard" (and author of
> >several massive
> >books) about something i pestered dalnet and sorcerynet on for years: an
> >ircd that
> >uses a hypercube topology and slave *servs in the ircd. Naturally, he will
> >get the credit
> >for continually bringing up the topic, not me. <sigh>
> >
> >Kat
> >
> >
> > > >From: Irv <irv.mullins at eudoramail.com>
> > > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > >To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> > > >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 19:44:55 -0800
> > > >
> > > >At 10:39 AM 2/2/01 -0800, Grape Vine wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>I need to be a little clear on what i meant
> > > >>I have a remote linux shell that i use
> > > >>that with a slow data connection makes it very slow
> > > >
> > > >Don't know if anything can be done about the slow data connection.
> > > >I use 100Mbps fast ethernet cards in my home lan, so I don't really see
> >any
> > > >difference between local and network transactions.
> > > >
> > > >>Any advise or help on using tcp/ip on linux?
> > > >>Ill have a local Linux setup again as soon as i
> > > >>get Debian, Open is bloatware like Windows and RH
> > > >>seams to be picky(prob just me)
> > > >
> > > >Not just you. The most stable and easiest to set up complete
> > > >Linux distribution, in my opinion, is SuSE, followed by Mandrake
> > > >(if you're using Pentiums) and then Slack. Didn't like Red Hat at all,
> >and
> > > >I've heard the same thing from others.
> > > >
> > > >Regards,
> > > >Irv
> > > >
> > > Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
> > > http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
