Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
Hehe, Ya everyone tells me dalnet is no
place to use abot. I use dalnet all the
time(if i am online i am on dallnet)
So it will be where i test the bot
I want to expland the bot to be a game
bot and maybe a chatter bot. Yea some
people hate that but Its mainly for ~me~
so it doesnt matter. About netsplits,
thats easy to take care of, make the bot
spaw a copy and hop on the other side
of the split, with a diff nick.
>From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
>Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
>To: EUforum at topica.com
>Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
>Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 20:23:12 -0800
>
>On 2 Feb 2001, at 19:59, Grape Vine wrote:
>
> > I dont realy need anything done about the slow connection
> > I dont plan on using the shell for anything other then
> > a stable tcp/ip link to dalnet, keep my channels open
> > a topic set. LAter i might do more.
>
>Lmao, dalnet?? Is there a *less* stable net? Even if you are connected, as
>much as
>they are DDoS'd and split, there is no telling if you get chanserv, or for
>that matter, any
>other server on the net! Why don't you let chanserv keep the topic and not
>worry about
>stability, cause there is no stability on the net, it's an illusion. Or go
>shopping for a
>better shell host.
>
>On a good note, there is a conference in Oz on net connections, and a paper
>is being
>delivered by one of the originators of the XML "standard" (and author of
>several massive
>books) about something i pestered dalnet and sorcerynet on for years: an
>ircd that
>uses a hypercube topology and slave *servs in the ircd. Naturally, he will
>get the credit
>for continually bringing up the topic, not me. <sigh>
>
>Kat
>
>
> > >From: Irv <irv.mullins at eudoramail.com>
> > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > >To: EUforum at topica.com
> > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> > >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 19:44:55 -0800
> > >
> > >At 10:39 AM 2/2/01 -0800, Grape Vine wrote:
> > >
> > >>I need to be a little clear on what i meant
> > >>I have a remote linux shell that i use
> > >>that with a slow data connection makes it very slow
> > >
> > >Don't know if anything can be done about the slow data connection.
> > >I use 100Mbps fast ethernet cards in my home lan, so I don't really see
>any
> > >difference between local and network transactions.
> > >
> > >>Any advise or help on using tcp/ip on linux?
> > >>Ill have a local Linux setup again as soon as i
> > >>get Debian, Open is bloatware like Windows and RH
> > >>seams to be picky(prob just me)
> > >
> > >Not just you. The most stable and easiest to set up complete
> > >Linux distribution, in my opinion, is SuSE, followed by Mandrake
> > >(if you're using Pentiums) and then Slack. Didn't like Red Hat at all,
>and
> > >I've heard the same thing from others.
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Irv
> > >
> >
>
>
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
