Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
- Posted by Grape Vine <g__vine at hotmail.com> Feb 03, 2001
- 413 views
I know, And that is the ~only~ time that my bot should care about a netsplit (less services are down when the bot loads) >From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com >To: EUforum at topica.com >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows >Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 16:02:23 -0800 > >On 3 Feb 2001, at 14:24, Grape Vine wrote: > > > > > > > Nope, i found a way that is easy, > > Or at least it looks easy. When a > > netsplit does happen irc tells you > > where it happens, > >Only if someone in your channel is split off, then it tells you. If no one >in your channel >is split, then every other server on the net can split, and you'll never >know it. > >Kat > > > > If my bot see's it > > (and only if it see's it) It hop's > > on the other side of the split > > This way the bot only need to worry > > about splits when it affects it > > > > Grape > > > > >From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> > > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com > > >To: EUforum at topica.com > > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows > > >Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 10:15:35 -0800 > > > > > >On 3 Feb 2001, at 7:55, Grape Vine wrote: > > > > > > > Hehe, Ya everyone tells me dalnet is no > > > > place to use abot. I use dalnet all the > > > > time(if i am online i am on dallnet) > > > > So it will be where i test the bot > > > > I want to expland the bot to be a game > > > > bot and maybe a chatter bot. Yea some > > > > people hate that but Its mainly for ~me~ > > > > so it doesnt matter. About netsplits, > > > > thats easy to take care of, make the bot > > > > spaw a copy and hop on the other side > > > > of the split, with a diff nick. > > > > > >So the bot is constantly doing /links and comparing that with a list of > > >what it should > > >be? ouch. > > > > > >Kat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> > > > > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com > > > > >To: EUforum at topica.com > > > > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows > > > > >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 20:23:12 -0800 > > > > > > > > > >On 2 Feb 2001, at 19:59, Grape Vine wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I dont realy need anything done about the slow connection > > > > > > I dont plan on using the shell for anything other then > > > > > > a stable tcp/ip link to dalnet, keep my channels open > > > > > > a topic set. LAter i might do more. > > > > > > > > > >Lmao, dalnet?? Is there a *less* stable net? Even if you are >connected, > > >as > > > > >much as > > > > >they are DDoS'd and split, there is no telling if you get chanserv, >or > > >for > > > > >that matter, any > > > > >other server on the net! Why don't you let chanserv keep the topic >and > > >not > > > > >worry about > > > > >stability, cause there is no stability on the net, it's an >illusion. Or > > >go > > > > >shopping for a > > > > >better shell host. > > > > > > > > > >On a good note, there is a conference in Oz on net connections, and >a > > >paper > > > > >is being > > > > >delivered by one of the originators of the XML "standard" (and >author > > >of > > > > >several massive > > > > >books) about something i pestered dalnet and sorcerynet on for >years: > > >an > > > > >ircd that > > > > >uses a hypercube topology and slave *servs in the ircd. Naturally, >he > > >will > > > > >get the credit > > > > >for continually bringing up the topic, not me. <sigh> > > > > > > > > > >Kat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: Irv <irv.mullins at eudoramail.com> > > > > > > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com > > > > > > >To: EUforum at topica.com > > > > > > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows > > > > > > >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 19:44:55 -0800 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >At 10:39 AM 2/2/01 -0800, Grape Vine wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>I need to be a little clear on what i meant > > > > > > >>I have a remote linux shell that i use > > > > > > >>that with a slow data connection makes it very slow > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Don't know if anything can be done about the slow data >connection. > > > > > > >I use 100Mbps fast ethernet cards in my home lan, so I don't >really > > >see > > > > >any > > > > > > >difference between local and network transactions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Any advise or help on using tcp/ip on linux? > > > > > > >>Ill have a local Linux setup again as soon as i > > > > > > >>get Debian, Open is bloatware like Windows and RH > > > > > > >>seams to be picky(prob just me) > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Not just you. The most stable and easiest to set up complete > > > > > > >Linux distribution, in my opinion, is SuSE, followed by >Mandrake > > > > > > >(if you're using Pentiums) and then Slack. Didn't like Red Hat >at > > >all, > > > > >and > > > > > > >I've heard the same thing from others. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards, > > > > > > >Irv > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01 > > > > > > > > > > > > >