Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

I know, And that is the ~only~ time
that my bot should care about a netsplit
(less services are down when the bot loads)

>From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
>Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
>To: EUforum at topica.com
>Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
>Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 16:02:23 -0800
>
>On 3 Feb 2001, at 14:24, Grape Vine wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Nope, i found a way that is easy,
> > Or at least it looks easy. When a
> > netsplit does happen irc tells you
> > where it happens,
>
>Only if someone in your channel is split off, then it tells you. If no one 
>in your channel
>is split, then every other server on the net can split, and you'll never 
>know it.
>
>Kat
>
>
> > If my bot see's it
> > (and only if it see's it) It hop's
> > on the other side of the split
> > This way the bot only need to worry
> > about splits when it affects it
> >
> > Grape
> >
> > >From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
> > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > >To: EUforum at topica.com
> > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> > >Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 10:15:35 -0800
> > >
> > >On 3 Feb 2001, at 7:55, Grape Vine wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hehe, Ya everyone tells me dalnet is no
> > > > place to use abot. I use dalnet all the
> > > > time(if i am online i am on dallnet)
> > > > So it will be where i test the bot
> > > > I want to expland the bot to be a game
> > > > bot and maybe a chatter bot. Yea some
> > > > people hate that but Its mainly for ~me~
> > > > so it doesnt matter. About netsplits,
> > > > thats easy to take care of, make the bot
> > > > spaw a copy and hop on the other side
> > > > of the split, with a diff nick.
> > >
> > >So the bot is constantly doing /links and comparing that with a list of
> > >what it should
> > >be? ouch.
> > >
> > >Kat
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
> > > > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > > >To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> > > > >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 20:23:12 -0800
> > > > >
> > > > >On 2 Feb 2001, at 19:59, Grape Vine wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I dont realy need anything done about the slow connection
> > > > > > I dont plan on using the shell for anything other then
> > > > > > a stable tcp/ip link to dalnet, keep my channels open
> > > > > > a topic set. LAter i might do more.
> > > > >
> > > > >Lmao, dalnet?? Is there a *less* stable net? Even if you are 
>connected,
> > >as
> > > > >much as
> > > > >they are DDoS'd and split, there is no telling if you get chanserv, 
>or
> > >for
> > > > >that matter, any
> > > > >other server on the net! Why don't you let chanserv keep the topic 
>and
> > >not
> > > > >worry about
> > > > >stability, cause there is no stability on the net, it's an 
>illusion. Or
> > >go
> > > > >shopping for a
> > > > >better shell host.
> > > > >
> > > > >On a good note, there is a conference in Oz on net connections, and 
>a
> > >paper
> > > > >is being
> > > > >delivered by one of the originators of the XML "standard" (and 
>author
> > >of
> > > > >several massive
> > > > >books) about something i pestered dalnet and sorcerynet on for 
>years:
> > >an
> > > > >ircd that
> > > > >uses a hypercube topology and slave *servs in the ircd. Naturally, 
>he
> > >will
> > > > >get the credit
> > > > >for continually bringing up the topic, not me. <sigh>
> > > > >
> > > > >Kat
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >From: Irv <irv.mullins at eudoramail.com>
> > > > > > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > > > > >To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > > > > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> > > > > > >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 19:44:55 -0800
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >At 10:39 AM 2/2/01 -0800, Grape Vine wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>I need to be a little clear on what i meant
> > > > > > >>I have a remote linux shell that i use
> > > > > > >>that with a slow data connection makes it very slow
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Don't know if anything can be done about the slow data 
>connection.
> > > > > > >I use 100Mbps fast ethernet cards in my home lan, so I don't 
>really
> > >see
> > > > >any
> > > > > > >difference between local and network transactions.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>Any advise or help on using tcp/ip on linux?
> > > > > > >>Ill have a local Linux setup again as soon as i
> > > > > > >>get Debian, Open is bloatware like Windows and RH
> > > > > > >>seams to be picky(prob just me)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Not just you. The most stable and easiest to set up complete
> > > > > > >Linux distribution, in my opinion, is SuSE, followed by 
>Mandrake
> > > > > > >(if you're using Pentiums) and then Slack. Didn't like Red Hat 
>at
> > >all,
> > > > >and
> > > > > > >I've heard the same thing from others.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Regards,
> > > > > > >Irv
> > > > > > >
> > > > >http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
>
>

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu