OpenEuphoria

Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows

• Posted by Grape Vine <g__vine at hotmail.com> Feb 03, 2001
• 449 views

Nope, i found a way that is easy,
Or at least it looks easy. When a
netsplit does happen irc tells you
where it happens, If my bot see's it
(and only if it see's it) It hop's
on the other side of the split
This way the bot only need to worry
about splits when it affects it

Grape

>From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
>Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
>To: EUforum at topica.com
>Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
>Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 10:15:35 -0800
>
>On 3 Feb 2001, at 7:55, Grape Vine wrote:
>
> > Hehe, Ya everyone tells me dalnet is no
> > place to use abot. I use dalnet all the
> > time(if i am online i am on dallnet)
> > So it will be where i test the bot
> > I want to expland the bot to be a game
> > bot and maybe a chatter bot. Yea some
> > people hate that but Its mainly for ~me~
> > so it doesnt matter. About netsplits,
> > thats easy to take care of, make the bot
> > spaw a copy and hop on the other side
> > of the split, with a diff nick.
>
>So the bot is constantly doing /links and comparing that with a list of 
>what it should
>be? ouch.
>
>Kat
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > >From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
> > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > >To: EUforum at topica.com
> > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> > >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 20:23:12 -0800
> > >
> > >On 2 Feb 2001, at 19:59, Grape Vine wrote:
> > >
> > > > I dont realy need anything done about the slow connection
> > > > I dont plan on using the shell for anything other then
> > > > a stable tcp/ip link to dalnet, keep my channels open
> > > > a topic set. LAter i might do more.
> > >
> > >Lmao, dalnet?? Is there a *less* stable net? Even if you are connected, 
>as
> > >much as
> > >they are DDoS'd and split, there is no telling if you get chanserv, or 
>for
> > >that matter, any
> > >other server on the net! Why don't you let chanserv keep the topic and 
>not
> > >worry about
> > >stability, cause there is no stability on the net, it's an illusion. Or 
>go
> > >shopping for a
> > >better shell host.
> > >
> > >On a good note, there is a conference in Oz on net connections, and a 
>paper
> > >is being
> > >delivered by one of the originators of the XML "standard" (and author 
>of
> > >several massive
> > >books) about something i pestered dalnet and sorcerynet on for years: 
>an
> > >ircd that
> > >uses a hypercube topology and slave *servs in the ircd. Naturally, he 
>will
> > >get the credit
> > >for continually bringing up the topic, not me. <sigh>
> > >
> > >Kat
> > >
> > >
> > > > >From: Irv <irv.mullins at eudoramail.com>
> > > > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > > >To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > > >Subject: Re: Eu, IRC, Linux, Windows
> > > > >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 19:44:55 -0800
> > > > >
> > > > >At 10:39 AM 2/2/01 -0800, Grape Vine wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >>I need to be a little clear on what i meant
> > > > >>I have a remote linux shell that i use
> > > > >>that with a slow data connection makes it very slow
> > > > >
> > > > >Don't know if anything can be done about the slow data connection.
> > > > >I use 100Mbps fast ethernet cards in my home lan, so I don't really 
>see
> > >any
> > > > >difference between local and network transactions.
> > > > >
> > > > >>Any advise or help on using tcp/ip on linux?
> > > > >>Ill have a local Linux setup again as soon as i
> > > > >>get Debian, Open is bloatware like Windows and RH
> > > > >>seams to be picky(prob just me)
> > > > >
> > > > >Not just you. The most stable and easiest to set up complete
> > > > >Linux distribution, in my opinion, is SuSE, followed by Mandrake
> > > > >(if you're using Pentiums) and then Slack. Didn't like Red Hat at 
>all,
> > >and
> > > > >I've heard the same thing from others.
> > > > >
> > > > >Regards,
> > > > >Irv
> > > > >
> > > > Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
> > > > http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>