RE: Small feature request for future EU versions

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Derek Parnell wrote:
> 
> 
> posted by: Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com>
> 
> Chris Bensler wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > 
> > I think I would prefer an operator like ==.
> 
> And I would like '=' to only be an equality test, ':=' to only be an
> assignment action and 'element_eq()' to be the sequence operation.
> 
> If we have '==' we should logically also have '<<', '>>', '!==', '<<=' 
> and '>>='.
> 

That would work for me, change the behaviour of seq = seq, and use ==, 
<< , etc.. for dimmed operators.

Chris Bensler
Code is Alchemy

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu