RE: Small feature request for future EU versions
- Posted by Chris Bensler <bensler at nt.net> Oct 17, 2004
- 590 views
CoJaBo wrote: > > > posted by: CoJaBo <cojabo at suscom.net> > > Vincent wrote: > > > > It would be nice to have the '==' (equal comparison) relational > > operator implemented in future versions of EU. Many programming > Unfortunatly this, while it certainly be helpful, will probably never > be added... > It sounds like we will be able to add it ourselves once 2.5 arrives. > > languages have this operator for equal comparision, while EU > > uses equal(). I doubt anyone will comfuse '==' with the '=' > > assignment operator. And if this is a compatibility issue, > > keep the equal() ruitine until people agree that it is no longer > If this is ever added, equal() should remain. '==' would simply > be short for equal(). Less typing good! > bool = equal(s1,s2) is just a shortcut for bool = (compare(s1,s2) = 0) I think I would prefer an operator like ==. I think that is something that can be done in a preprocessor though. Alot of the changes that people want can be done in a preprocessor, and once 2.5 arrives, we will have the ability to edit the front end, I beleive, which is even better than a preprocesor. Chris Bensler Code is Alchemy