Re: Small feature request for future EU versions
- Posted by "Juergen Luethje" <j.lue at gmx.de> Oct 17, 2004
- 654 views
Derek Parnell wrote: > Chris Bensler wrote: > > [snip] > >> >> I think I would prefer an operator like ==. > > And I would like '=' to only be an equality test, ':=' to only be an > assignment action and 'element_eq()' to be the sequence operation. Me too. > If we have '==' we should logically also have '<<', '>>', '!==', '<<=' > and '>>='. Oh no, please. >> I think that is something that can be done in a preprocessor though. >> Alot of the changes that people want can be done in a preprocessor, and >> once 2.5 arrives, we will have the ability to edit the front end, I >> beleive, which is even better than a preprocesor. > > Yes, this is going to be survival-of-the-fitest game, with lots > of variants vying for attention. Yep. Regards, Juergen