Re: Small feature request for future EU versions

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Derek Parnell wrote:

> Chris Bensler wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>
>> I think I would prefer an operator like ==.
>
> And I would like '=' to only be an equality test, ':=' to only be an
> assignment action and 'element_eq()' to be the sequence operation.

Me too.

> If we have '==' we should logically also have '<<', '>>', '!==', '<<='
> and '>>='.

Oh no, please.

>> I think that is something that can be done in a preprocessor though.
>> Alot of the changes that people want can be done in a preprocessor, and
>> once 2.5 arrives, we will have the ability to edit the front end, I
>> beleive, which is even better than a preprocesor.
>
> Yes, this is going to be survival-of-the-fitest game, with lots
> of variants vying for attention.

Yep. smile

Regards,
   Juergen

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu