Re: Small feature request for future EU versions

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Juergen Luethje wrote:
> 
> Derek Parnell wrote:
> 
> Chris Bensler wrote:
> >> [snip]

> >> I think that is something that can be done in a preprocessor though.
> >> Alot of the changes that people want can be done in a preprocessor, and
> >> once 2.5 arrives, we will have the ability to edit the front end, I
> >> beleive, which is even better than a preprocesor.
> >
> > Yes, this is going to be survival-of-the-fitest game, with lots
> > of variants vying for attention.
> 
> Yep. smile
> 
> Regards,
>    Juergen
> 
> 

survival-of-the-fittest game! 
oh no. sad

please don't go off in different directions like pieces of a bomb.
communicate with each other , all those who want to work on the project.
get the same syntax down (names of functions,procedures and arguments).
then each can try to make the inside of those routines better.

or like an ide does, make a front end better using different methods (maybe even
a pre-processor ) but stick to the same insides(syntax used for the routines).

just my thoughts.

rudy

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu