Re: Small feature request for future EU versions

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

rudy toews wrote:

> Juergen Luethje wrote:
>>
>> Derek Parnell wrote:
>>
>> Chris Bensler wrote:
>>>> [snip]
>
>>>> I think that is something that can be done in a preprocessor though.
>>>> Alot of the changes that people want can be done in a preprocessor, and
>>>> once 2.5 arrives, we will have the ability to edit the front end, I
>>>> beleive, which is even better than a preprocesor.
>>>
>>> Yes, this is going to be survival-of-the-fitest game, with lots
>>> of variants vying for attention.
>>
>> Yep. smile
>>
>
> survival-of-the-fittest game!
> oh no. sad
>
> please don't go off in different directions like pieces of a bomb.
> communicate with each other , all those who want to work on the project.
> get the same syntax down (names of functions,procedures and arguments).

I agree that this is desirable. Experience from the past as well as this
little discussion shows, that different people often have different
preferences, though.

> then each can try to make the inside of those routines better.
>
> or like an ide does, make a front end better using different methods
> (maybe even a pre-processor ) but stick to the same insides(syntax used
> for the routines).
>
> just my thoughts.

Regards,
   Juergen

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu