RE: Small feature request for future EU versions

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Chris Bensler wrote:

[snip]

> 
> I think I would prefer an operator like ==.

And I would like '=' to only be an equality test, ':=' to only be an
assignment action and 'element_eq()' to be the sequence operation.

If we have '==' we should logically also have '<<', '>>', '!==', '<<=' 
and '>>='.

 
> I think that is something that can be done in a preprocessor though.
> Alot of the changes that people want can be done in a preprocessor, and 
> once 2.5 arrives, we will have the ability to edit the front end, I 
> beleive, which is even better than a preprocesor.

Yes, this is going to be survival-of-the-fitest game, with lots
of variants vying for attention.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu