RE: Small feature request for future EU versions
- Posted by Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com> Oct 17, 2004
- 533 views
Chris Bensler wrote: [snip] > > I think I would prefer an operator like ==. And I would like '=' to only be an equality test, ':=' to only be an assignment action and 'element_eq()' to be the sequence operation. If we have '==' we should logically also have '<<', '>>', '!==', '<<=' and '>>='. > I think that is something that can be done in a preprocessor though. > Alot of the changes that people want can be done in a preprocessor, and > once 2.5 arrives, we will have the ability to edit the front end, I > beleive, which is even better than a preprocesor. Yes, this is going to be survival-of-the-fitest game, with lots of variants vying for attention. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia