OpenEuphoria

Re: nix config next steps

• Posted by Bernie Ryan <xotron at ?luefro?.com> Dec 22, 2007
• 481 views

CChris wrote:
> 
> Julio C. Galaret Viera wrote:
> > 
> > Matt Lewis wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > *  Are names like backendu, bind and shroud too generic?  Assuming that
> > > the
> > > ultimate goal is to get accepted into Linux distributions, do these
> > > conflict
> > > with anything already out there?  Should we change them?  If so, to what?
> > 
> > I think that names like "bind" might lead to confusion.
> > 
> > BIND = Berkeley Internet Name Domain
> > 
> > Please see <a
> > href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BIND">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BIND</a>
> > 
> > JG
> 
> Why not bindeu, shroudeu and backendeu?
> They don't sound too unfamiliar and are less likely to clash with anything
> else.
> 

It would make more sense to call them:

bind.eu, shroud.eu and backend.eu

Bernie

My files in archive:
WMOTOR, XMOTOR, W32ENGIN, MIXEDLIB, EU_ENGIN, WIN32ERU, WIN32API 

Can be downloaded here:
http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/asearch.exu?dos=on&win=on&lnx=on&gen=on&keywords=bernie+ryan