Re: nix config next steps

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Julio C. Galaret Viera wrote:
> 
> Matt Lewis wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > *  Are names like backendu, bind and shroud too generic?  Assuming that the
> > ultimate goal is to get accepted into Linux distributions, do these conflict
> > with anything already out there?  Should we change them?  If so, to what?
> 
> I think that names like "bind" might lead to confusion.
> 
> BIND = Berkeley Internet Name Domain
> 
> Please see <a
> href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BIND">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BIND</a>
> 
> JG

Why not bindeu, shroudeu and backendeu?
They don't sound too unfamiliar and are less likely to clash with anything else.

CChris

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu