Re: nix config next steps

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Bernie Ryan wrote:
> 
> CChris wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Why not bindeu, shroudeu and backendeu?
> > They don't sound too unfamiliar and are less likely to clash with anything
> > else.
> > 
> 
> It would make more sense to call them:
> 
> bind.eu, shroud.eu and backend.eu
> 

One issue with that scheme is that they look like include files, which they
aren't.

I kinda like:

  eubind eushroud eubackend

Matt

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu