Re: bad bug continued
- Posted by George Walters <gwalters at sc.rr.com> Aug 10, 2001
- 464 views
Yes, that is exactly what i'm saying. Using Matt's suggestion of shellExecuteEx() does not lock up anything... but the system_exec() does lock up quicklink and the monitor wakeup stuff. ...george ----- Original Message ----- From: "Irv Mullins" <irvm at ellijay.com> To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 12:17 PM Subject: Re: bad bug continued > > > > > > > well, i don't know. EU locks up my computer when the monitor goes to > sleep, > > but quick link does not. EU locks up my quick link. So I don't know... I > > give up..I for sure can't solve it. Using Matt's suggestion with > > shellExecuteEx doesen't have the problem..@#$%/ > > OK, I've gotten lost. Are you saying that Matt's example causes no problems, > even > when you use it to execute another Eu program? But using the shellExecuteEx > call > in a Win32Lib program does cause the problem(s)? > > What you really need to know, as I see it, is:"will your program, written in > Euphoria, using Win32Lib, lock up people's computers if they run it by > clicking on the icon." > Your clients won't be using Matt's editor, or anything like that, to run > your programs, > and you can easily avoid the use of system_exec() or shellExecuteEx in your > programs. > > Regards, > Irv > > > > > > >