Re: Allow me to introduce myself...
- Posted by Mark Brown <mabrown at SENET.COM.AU> Aug 15, 2000
- 543 views
Now *that* was a flame. Unfortunately it will be way too clever for Michael. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kat" <gertie at PELL.NET> To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU> Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 7:36 AM Subject: Re: Allow me to introduce myself... > On 14 Aug 2000, at 20:43, Mike The Spike wrote: > > > And read what I says, I'm an AI coder, not a linguest. > > What language do you work with? Misspelling? How does your Ai know what you > mean if you can't spell a word the same way twice (unless it's simple and wrong each > time)? I'm serious, if you code Ai programs, really *code* as opposed to data entry, > how does your Ai deal with so much misspelling and bad syntax and atrocious > semantics? I tried various approximation programs, like Metaphone, which i rewrote > from C to Eu, and they threw away too much info, imho. And they didn't deal well with > regional pronunciation when that was needed. Show me how you do it? > > > I know about my grammer. > > Still trying for "grammar"? > > > It's just that I'm not going to go through all this trouble of checking my > > spelling for anyone. > > Just run an auto-check-replace program,, your Ai should be smart enough to figure out > what words you meant to use, and it would be a learning experience for it. > > > Plus, my posts have bad spelled content, yours are spelled right, but don't > > have content at all. > > "badly" is the adverb you were looking for, and possessives are usually spelled with an > apostrophe. Two errors like that in one sentence make absolutely 4x the number of > possible parses, and to err on the safe side, the Ai would need to assume there are > more errors and parse for them too, how does your Ai handle that? > > On 14 Aug 2000, at 20:52, Mike The Spike wrote: > > > WTF? > > You little shit, I ain't even gonna read this crap. > > If you ain't got what it takes to flame a man, then shut that hole you call > > a mouth. > > Maybe whoever wrote that didn't know you are (were?) a man. Is that even relavant > online? > > Kat