1. RE: Repeat efficiency
> >
> > e = time() m = 4 * 768 * 1024
> > z = allocate(m)
> > mem_set(z, m, 0)
The 2nd & 3rd terms of mem_set look inverted here.
2. RE: Repeat efficiency
Derek Parnell wrote:
> You're correct. Not very intuitive for me. I had in mind that I was
> setting
> a block of memory to a value so I thought in terms of a block (Addr :
> Length) then the value.
>
> It should have been...
>
> size = 4 * 768 * 1024
> addr = allocate(size)
> mem_set(addr, 0, size)
>
>
I think it was intuitive of you -- I think the required order of terms
is counter-inituitive. The only reason I noticed is because I always
screw that one up. Just seems more natural the other way...
