RE: Repeat efficiency

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Derek Parnell wrote:
> You're correct. Not very intuitive for me. I had in mind that I was 
> setting
> a block of memory to a value so I thought in terms of a block (Addr :
> Length) then the value.
> 
> It should have been...
> 
>  size = 4 * 768 * 1024
>  addr = allocate(size)
>  mem_set(addr, 0, size)
> 
> 

I think it was intuitive of you -- I think the required order of terms 
is counter-inituitive.  The only reason I noticed is because I always 
screw that one up.  Just seems more natural the other way...

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu