1. wxEuphoria and GTK
Questions:
1. Does wxeu.so use GTK?
2. If YES, then which version(s) does wxeu.so use? GTK1? GTK2?
3. What happens if someone has GTK2 but not GTK1?
2. Re: wxEuphoria and GTK
Jerry Story wrote:
>
> Questions:
>
> 1. Does wxeu.so use GTK?
>
> 2. If YES, then which version(s) does wxeu.so use? GTK1? GTK2?
>
> 3. What happens if someone has GTK2 but not GTK1?
1. Yes.
2. GTK 1.2
3. I think it would pretty much do and feel the same. However, i'm not too
sure of that. You can always download GTK 1 stuff if there's a problem.
Matt mentions in the documentation that when he upgrades the wxWidgets
version that he uses, wxEuphoria will then use GTK 2+
3. Re: wxEuphoria and GTK
Jerry Story wrote:
>
> Questions:
>
> 1. Does wxeu.so use GTK?
Yes.
> 2. If YES, then which version(s) does wxeu.so use? GTK1? GTK2?
v1.2.X
> 3. What happens if someone has GTK2 but not GTK1?
It probably will fail to load the shared library, since several dependencies
won't be there. Are there systems that have GTK2 but not GTK1? I suppose
some custom, semi-minimal distro might, but (and I'm not an expert here)
anytime GTK2 is installed, GTK1 seems to be there, too.
Matt
4. Re: wxEuphoria and GTK
Matt Lewis wrote:
>
> Jerry Story wrote:
> >
> > Questions:
> >
> > 1. Does wxeu.so use GTK?
>
> Yes.
>
> > 2. If YES, then which version(s) does wxeu.so use? GTK1? GTK2?
>
> v1.2.X
>
> > 3. What happens if someone has GTK2 but not GTK1?
>
> It probably will fail to load the shared library, since several dependencies
> won't be there. Are there systems that have GTK2 but not GTK1? I suppose
> some custom, semi-minimal distro might, but (and I'm not an expert here)
> anytime GTK2 is installed, GTK1 seems to be there, too.
>
> Matt
The thing is, that GTK2 is somewhat Backwards Compatable with GTK1, but not
enough to really justify just having GTK2 installed. It's best, to ensure that
there are no problems, that GTK1 also be installed. Should be able to install
GTK1 with no problems.
Mario Steele
http://enchantedblade.trilake.net
Attaining World Dominiation, one byte at a time...
5. Re: wxEuphoria and GTK
Mario Steele wrote:
> The thing is, that GTK2 is somewhat Backwards Compatable with GTK1,
> but not enough to really justify just having GTK2 installed.
> It's best, to ensure that there are no problems, that GTK1 also be
> installed. Should be able to install GTK1 with no problems.
The person who had the machine-level error message was using Fedora Core 5.
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=fedora
I see GTK2 but not GTK1.
1. Does that mean it does not have GTK1?
2. Could that cause the machine-level error message?
6. Re: wxEuphoria and GTK
On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 23:34 -0800, Jerry Story wrote:
>
>
> posted by: Jerry Story <jstory at ocii.com>
>
> Mario Steele wrote:
>
> > The thing is, that GTK2 is somewhat Backwards Compatable with GTK1,
> > but not enough to really justify just having GTK2 installed.
> > It's best, to ensure that there are no problems, that GTK1 also be
> > installed. Should be able to install GTK1 with no problems.
>
> The person who had the machine-level error message was using Fedora Core 5.
> http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=fedora
>
> I see GTK2 but not GTK1.
> 1. Does that mean it does not have GTK1?
GTK1 does NOT come with Fedora Core 5...
but can be installed via yum
> 2. Could that cause the machine-level error message?
http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan/porting/
most notable Symbol GtkPixmap is now GtkImage
and there are lots of deprecated Symbols..!
--
Regards,
Euman
Registered Linux User #380358
