Re: Please help me, who to start (Beginner)
Uwe gruenewald wrote:
>
> I see, that are good arguments and I must admit, the language by itself realy
> seams to be easy. So it´s a pitty to give it up.
> But the periphery is so comlicated to handle, that´s very frustrating, when
> there is no surface for comming in.
> Why euphoria is so hidden in this funtionality?
> Why is it possible to open Delpi with a click and you can set buttons and
> fields
> and there is a prepared place for scripting and why doesn`t the same work in
> Euphoria?
> For example, who want´s nowadays going back to the routs, to learn Dos again?
> Not everybody is grown up with that old way to use a computer.
> I don´t see, why it should be nessesary to spend time in learning an outmoded
> concept?
> I like it to use "clicky bunty" and i also have to present programs with
> handsome
> fields an buttons.
> Give me a surface like in delphi and a same easy way to get in and I surely
> could find many people to convince of Euphoria.
> Perhaps Euphoria isn`t that sophisticated and it´s better to wait, till it
> will
> be growing up out of the range of hackers?
>
> Cheers,
> Uwe
>
Let see... you're interested in RAD and looking for a good IDE, along with a
high-level Windows 32 development library for Euphoria... yes?
Well then we got just what you are looking for. They are called Win32Lib and
Judith Evan's Enhanced IDE. 
Download them here:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/euvide/IDEwin32lib.zip
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/euvide/IDE0-19-3.zip
Regards,
Vincent
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
