Re: include-paths (Rob Craig)

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

On 8 Apr 2001, at 10:10, Robert Craig wrote:


> 
> stabmaster writes:
> > My question is; why can't Ex look for include files in the 
> > directory of their direct "parent" (BAR.E in this case), 
> > and not only in the directory of FOO.EX ?
> 
> Thanks for the suggestion.
> Others have made similar suggestions.
> I'll consider it if/when I get around to making
> changes to the include mechanism.

This comes under the heading "Making It Smarter". After all, if i need 
something, i'll first look around me where i am, before i book a plane to 
Alaska to look for it there. Interpreters should be mind-bogglingly smarter 
than they are now, but without the unannounced and pseudo-random context 
shifts of REBOL.

Kat

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu