Re: include-paths (Rob Craig)
- Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> Apr 08, 2001
- 519 views
On 8 Apr 2001, at 10:10, Robert Craig wrote: > > stabmaster writes: > > My question is; why can't Ex look for include files in the > > directory of their direct "parent" (BAR.E in this case), > > and not only in the directory of FOO.EX ? > > Thanks for the suggestion. > Others have made similar suggestions. > I'll consider it if/when I get around to making > changes to the include mechanism. This comes under the heading "Making It Smarter". After all, if i need something, i'll first look around me where i am, before i book a plane to Alaska to look for it there. Interpreters should be mind-bogglingly smarter than they are now, but without the unannounced and pseudo-random context shifts of REBOL. Kat