Re: [OT] Interesting?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

So Lincoln should have said "...our forefatherers..."?

gertie at visionsix.com wrote:

>
>
>On 18 Jul 2003, at 11:39, 1evan at sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
>  
>>forebear ;)
>>literal translation?
>>fore -> been
>>bear -> be
>>I suppose.
>>    
>>
>Well, that makes no sense either.
>What i was saying applied to that context. One could "forebear" a 
>descendant, that is, give birth to them, but that use sounds awkward to me. 
>Since the term could be used like that, then the person doing that would be 
>the do-er, the forebearER, not the forebear. To use "forebear" referring to the
>
>action is as bad as saying "i could care less", when i really couldn't.
>
>Kat
>
>  
>>gertie at visionsix.com wrote:
>>
>>    
>>>What does "from been to be" mean??
>>>
>>>Kat
>>> 
>>>
>>TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
>>
>>
>
>
>TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
>
>

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu