Re: [OT] Interesting?
- Posted by 1evan at sbcglobal.net Jul 18, 2003
- 488 views
So Lincoln should have said "...our forefatherers..."? gertie at visionsix.com wrote: > > >On 18 Jul 2003, at 11:39, 1evan at sbcglobal.net wrote: > > >>forebear ;) >>literal translation? >>fore -> been >>bear -> be >>I suppose. >> >> >Well, that makes no sense either. >What i was saying applied to that context. One could "forebear" a >descendant, that is, give birth to them, but that use sounds awkward to me. >Since the term could be used like that, then the person doing that would be >the do-er, the forebearER, not the forebear. To use "forebear" referring to the > >action is as bad as saying "i could care less", when i really couldn't. > >Kat > > >>gertie at visionsix.com wrote: >> >> >>>What does "from been to be" mean?? >>> >>>Kat >>> >>> >>TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! >> >> > > >TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! > >