Re: [OT] Interesting?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

On 18 Jul 2003, at 11:39, 1evan at sbcglobal.net wrote:

> 
> 
> forebear ;)
> literal translation?
> fore -> been
> bear -> be
> I suppose.

Well, that makes no sense either.
What i was saying applied to that context. One could "forebear" a 
descendant, that is, give birth to them, but that use sounds awkward to me. 
Since the term could be used like that, then the person doing that would be 
the do-er, the forebearER, not the forebear. To use "forebear" referring to the 
action is as bad as saying "i could care less", when i really couldn't.

Kat

> gertie at visionsix.com wrote:
> 
> >What does "from been to be" mean??
> >
> >Kat
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
> 
>

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu