Re: [OT] Interesting?
- Posted by gertie at visionsix.com Jul 18, 2003
- 499 views
On 18 Jul 2003, at 11:39, 1evan at sbcglobal.net wrote: > > > forebear ;) > literal translation? > fore -> been > bear -> be > I suppose. Well, that makes no sense either. What i was saying applied to that context. One could "forebear" a descendant, that is, give birth to them, but that use sounds awkward to me. Since the term could be used like that, then the person doing that would be the do-er, the forebearER, not the forebear. To use "forebear" referring to the action is as bad as saying "i could care less", when i really couldn't. Kat > gertie at visionsix.com wrote: > > >What does "from been to be" mean?? > > > >Kat > > > > > > > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! > >