RE: Win32lib (simple app) not working #2
- Posted by euman at bellsouth.net Aug 18, 2003
- 466 views
On 18 Aug 2003 at 20:00, Dave Probert wrote: > > > euman at bellsouth.net wrote: > > On 18 Aug 2003 at 19:53, Pete Lomax wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:50:22 -0400, euman at bellsouth.net wrote: > > > >Well, I must agree Win32lib 59.1 is pretty useless. > > > Ever the diplomat > > I can't actually agree here, I personally think that win32lib isn't > useless (waaay too strong!), but just not complete enough. > > It's an ongoing development library - just needs people, like > yourselves, to find and report errors. Possibly even find solutions and > submitting them to Derek to put in the next update. With a version > number like 0.59, it cannot be a full version - those usually get a > number like 1.1 or whatever :) > > The difference, as far as I can see, between win32lib and the others > I've looked at, is that it tries to remove the need to have lots of > different calls to w32_func(), etc in someones application. > Encapsulating commonly used features under a single procedure name, > instead of having half-a-dozen variants. > > My suggestion - don't deride it, help it. Thanks, Im fully aware of the still under construction clause. Ive been here since before David Cuny started talking about creating Win32lib and I have every faith that this library will eventually be what puts Euphoria on the map. But at this stage its pretty useless to me..... Euman