RE: Win32lib (simple app) not working #2
euman at bellsouth.net wrote:
> On 18 Aug 2003 at 19:53, Pete Lomax wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:50:22 -0400, euman at bellsouth.net wrote:
> > >Well, I must agree Win32lib 59.1 is pretty useless.
> > Ever the diplomat
I can't actually agree here, I personally think that win32lib isn't
useless (waaay too strong!), but just not complete enough.
It's an ongoing development library - just needs people, like
yourselves, to find and report errors. Possibly even find solutions and
submitting them to Derek to put in the next update. With a version
number like 0.59, it cannot be a full version - those usually get a
number like 1.1 or whatever :)
The difference, as far as I can see, between win32lib and the others
I've looked at, is that it tries to remove the need to have lots of
different calls to w32_func(), etc in someones application.
Encapsulating commonly used features under a single procedure name,
instead of having half-a-dozen variants.
My suggestion - don't deride it, help it.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
