Re: Declaring a Function Before it is used

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

On Thursday 30 October 2003 10:23 pm, you wrote:
>
>
> wow..I didn't realize that I could join this list and so quickly caues such
> a "stir" over a matter that I posted about.  heh..
>
> although, honestly, I imagine the reason that this is causing such
> controversy is becaue this is the one major flaw that I can see that
> Euphoria has.

Keep looking - you'll find more ;)

<snip>

> But, maybe that's logical? Maybe you have to sacrifice some of the power
> (i.e forward referencing functions) when you use an easier language, like
> Euphoria?  When you think about that, it makes sense.  I guess we shouldn't
> be expecting to be able to do as much with an easier language....

If it weren't just an arbitrary limitation based on some personal philosophy, 
I would agree. If Euphoria were just a language invented for the sole use of 
Rob, I would say "fine". However, once RDS decided to sell Euphoria, they 
put themselves in a different situation. Any good business person listens to 
customers' requests, and tries to satisfy them.

Irv

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu