RE: Order of list in forum
- Posted by Ron Austin <ronaustin at alltel.net> Oct 23, 2003
- 414 views
You are right. Somehow I got the idea that the messages were not in sorted order. I still think it would be better if they went from newest to oldest, but hey, I'm just a new guy and I don't want to make waves. Brian Broker wrote: > > > Not sure what you mean... Starting at the last message and working back > > in time, the time stamps on the web forum for the last 10 messages are > as follows: > > Oct 23, 2003 09:59 PDT > Oct 23, 2003 09:46 PDT > Oct 23, 2003 08:54 PDT > Oct 23, 2003 07:45 PDT > Oct 23, 2003 07:22 PDT > Oct 23, 2003 07:11 PDT > Oct 23, 2003 06:53 PDT > Oct 23, 2003 06:47 PDT > Oct 23, 2003 06:28 PDT > Oct 23, 2003 06:15 PDT > > When you sort by date, it takes time received into account. Newest > messages are on the bottom. It's not terribly bad when you get used to > it. > > -- Brian > > > Ron Austin wrote: > > > > > > This is probably been hashed over before, but I'm new so please bear > > with me. It appears that the posts on the forum are seperated by date, > > but not much else. Wouldn't it be better if the list was sorted by date > > > > and time order so the newest posts were on top? > > >