RE: Order of list in forum

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

You are right.  Somehow I got the idea that the messages were not in 
sorted order.  I still think it would be better if they went from newest 
to oldest, but hey, I'm just a new guy and I don't want to make waves.

Brian Broker wrote:
> 
> 
> Not sure what you mean...  Starting at the last message and working back 
> 
> in time, the time stamps on the web forum for the last 10 messages are 
> as follows:
> 
> Oct 23, 2003 09:59 PDT  
> Oct 23, 2003 09:46 PDT  
> Oct 23, 2003 08:54 PDT  
> Oct 23, 2003 07:45 PDT  
> Oct 23, 2003 07:22 PDT  
> Oct 23, 2003 07:11 PDT  
> Oct 23, 2003 06:53 PDT  
> Oct 23, 2003 06:47 PDT  
> Oct 23, 2003 06:28 PDT  
> Oct 23, 2003 06:15 PDT  
> 
> When you sort by date, it takes time received into account.  Newest 
> messages are on the bottom.  It's not terribly bad when you get used to 
> it.
> 
> -- Brian
> 
> 
> Ron Austin wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > This is probably been hashed over before, but I'm new so please bear 
> > with me.  It appears that the posts on the forum are seperated by date, 
> > but not much else.  Wouldn't it be better if the list was sorted by date 
> > 
> > and time order so the newest posts were on top? 
> > 
>

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu