RE: Order of list in forum
Not sure what you mean... Starting at the last message and working back
in time, the time stamps on the web forum for the last 10 messages are
as follows:
Oct 23, 2003 09:59 PDT
Oct 23, 2003 09:46 PDT
Oct 23, 2003 08:54 PDT
Oct 23, 2003 07:45 PDT
Oct 23, 2003 07:22 PDT
Oct 23, 2003 07:11 PDT
Oct 23, 2003 06:53 PDT
Oct 23, 2003 06:47 PDT
Oct 23, 2003 06:28 PDT
Oct 23, 2003 06:15 PDT
When you sort by date, it takes time received into account. Newest
messages are on the bottom. It's not terribly bad when you get used to
it.
-- Brian
Ron Austin wrote:
>
>
> This is probably been hashed over before, but I'm new so please bear
> with me. It appears that the posts on the forum are seperated by date,
> but not much else. Wouldn't it be better if the list was sorted by date
> and time order so the newest posts were on top?
>
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
