Re: another look at namespaces
Hello again Matt,
>
> > From: Igor Kachan [mailto:kinz at peterlink.ru]
>
> > There are 895 messages on the "namespace" key word in
> > the list's archive now.
> > The very good addition to the RDS's official Eu documentation
> > for better understanding, no?
> > The first message on this subject was in 2000 y.
> > But I think, I'll better use v2.2 for the first running of my
> > new code to get the pure picture about the 3-rd party globals,
> > so to say, an old good plane picture without resolutions,
> > scenarios etc.
> > And I'm SURE, my new code will work on v2.4 without any names
> > conflicts if it runs OK on 2.2 after I corrected new names in
> > my new code.
>
> Yes, but it seems that you understand the issue with 3rd party
> globals. It's easy enough to work around 3rd party globals in
> your own code, but what about getting 3rd party globals to play
> nicely with 4th or 5th party globals?
I am not going to *play* with 3,5,7...N-th party globals,
I am going to use them in my program.
To use globals I must know them all and well.
> The current answer is, you can't, unless you edit some 3rd, 4th,
> 5th, etc party code yourself (adding namespaces or changing names).
What a problem? I'll just replace names in any editor and will be
SURE my program will work on 10th ... party code.
MS editor edit.com replaces words in microseconds.
>
> Matt Lewis
>
Regards,
Igor Kachan
kinz at peterlink.ru
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
