1. Re: another look at namespaces
- Posted by Igor Kachan <kinz at peterlink.ru> Jul 11, 2003
- 425 views
Hello again Matt, > > > From: Igor Kachan [mailto:kinz at peterlink.ru] > > > There are 895 messages on the "namespace" key word in > > the list's archive now. > > The very good addition to the RDS's official Eu documentation > > for better understanding, no? > > The first message on this subject was in 2000 y. > > But I think, I'll better use v2.2 for the first running of my > > new code to get the pure picture about the 3-rd party globals, > > so to say, an old good plane picture without resolutions, > > scenarios etc. > > And I'm SURE, my new code will work on v2.4 without any names > > conflicts if it runs OK on 2.2 after I corrected new names in > > my new code. > > Yes, but it seems that you understand the issue with 3rd party > globals. It's easy enough to work around 3rd party globals in > your own code, but what about getting 3rd party globals to play > nicely with 4th or 5th party globals? I am not going to *play* with 3,5,7...N-th party globals, I am going to use them in my program. To use globals I must know them all and well. > The current answer is, you can't, unless you edit some 3rd, 4th, > 5th, etc party code yourself (adding namespaces or changing names). What a problem? I'll just replace names in any editor and will be SURE my program will work on 10th ... party code. MS editor edit.com replaces words in microseconds. > > Matt Lewis > Regards, Igor Kachan kinz at peterlink.ru