OpenEuphoria

For Liu Junfeng OOP & Eu, etc.

• Posted by Ken Rhodes <ken_rhodes30436 at yahoo.com> Mar 03, 2003
• 429 views

Hi Liu,

While looking over the bench marks document from the
latest Euphoria release I noticed something that
reminded me of a question you asked in one of your
posts to the forum... Why not have native OOP features
incorporated into Euphoria.

I think the simplest answer must be speed. Euphoria is
30 - 60 times faster than the popular interpreted
languages which have built in OOP support.  I had
referred you to Ruby because it is a popular pure oop
interpreter - Euphoria is almost 60 times faster than
Ruby!.

Also, recently you expressed interest in how you might
be able to distribute a program you had written to a
friend.  You might also download the e2c translator
and distribute the c -translated compiled version of
your program file... the delay time on the free
version  is a bit of an annoyance... but its less than
10 secs, I think.

Regards,
Kenneth Rhodes


Regards,
Ken