1. For Liu Junfeng OOP & Eu, etc.
Hi Liu,
While looking over the bench marks document from the
latest Euphoria release I noticed something that
reminded me of a question you asked in one of your
posts to the forum... Why not have native OOP features
incorporated into Euphoria.
I think the simplest answer must be speed. Euphoria is
30 - 60 times faster than the popular interpreted
languages which have built in OOP support. I had
referred you to Ruby because it is a popular pure oop
interpreter - Euphoria is almost 60 times faster than
Ruby!.
Also, recently you expressed interest in how you might
be able to distribute a program you had written to a
friend. You might also download the e2c translator
and distribute the c -translated compiled version of
your program file... the delay time on the free
version is a bit of an annoyance... but its less than
10 secs, I think.
Regards,
Kenneth Rhodes
Regards,
Ken
2. Re: For Liu Junfeng OOP & Eu, etc.
By changing a line in the produced C source code,
you can decrease the delay to below 0.5 second.
But I wonder, is it legal?
K> While looking over the bench marks document from the
K> latest Euphoria release I noticed something that
K> reminded me of a question you asked in one of your
K> posts to the forum... Why not have native OOP features
K> incorporated into Euphoria.
K> I think the simplest answer must be speed. Euphoria is
K> 30 - 60 times faster than the popular interpreted
K> languages which have built in OOP support. I had
K> referred you to Ruby because it is a popular pure oop
K> interpreter - Euphoria is almost 60 times faster than
K> Ruby!.
K> Also, recently you expressed interest in how you might
K> be able to distribute a program you had written to a
K> friend. You might also download the e2c translator
K> and distribute the c -translated compiled version of
K> your program file... the delay time on the free
K> version is a bit of an annoyance... but its less than
K> 10 secs, I think.
K> Regards,
K> Kenneth Rhodes
