Re: Include System (was Standardized Euphoria)
Pete Lomax wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 11:57:50 -0800, Chris Bensler <guest at RapidEuphoria.com>
> wrote:
>
> >It's basically what I'm doing.
> Yep, looks fine to me.
>
> >Yer saying that if foo/xxx.e is already included and I try to include
> >bar/xxx.e which doesn't exist, it should default to foo/xxx.e like it
> >did when using previous versions of Eu?
> Nearly.
> >I don't agree. I consider the previous behaviour to be broken.
> When you say "bar/xxx.e", as opposed to just "xxx.e", and there is no such
> file loaded from a subdirectory named bar, wherever that dir is, then I
> agree, but imo when you just say "xxx.e" you imply you don't care where
> it is, and of course the compiler will look in current_dir, EUINC, EUDIR,
> and possibly a few other places as well for you.
>
> What I now (in Positive) have, and let's be honest not exactly difficult
> to implement, is this:
> }}}
<eucode>
> include test\t05\inc5\t2.e
> --include t2.e -- OK
> --include inc5\t2.e -- OK
> --include c5\t2.e -- Bad
> --include foo\t2.e -- Bad
> </eucode>
{{{
>
> Another way to say this is: if your app uses libs from Chris and Dave,
> which both use Bob's, correct organisation is Bob/Chris/Dave, not
> Chris/Bob/Dave/Bob.
>
> The way things stand, if I try to put bob.e and associated paraphernalia
> into bob\, then the "include bob.e" statements in chris.e and dave.e will
> both crash.
>
> Regards,
> Pete
bob.e != bob\bob.e
If we allow that, we create ambiguity when the programmer actually means he
wants to include bob.e eventhough there is also a bob\bob.e
What if I have bob\bob.e already and I want to move the file into the project
folder? From what I understand, your solution only addresses the opposite
circumstance.
Chris Bensler
~ The difference between ordinary and extraordinary is that little extra ~
http://empire.iwireweb.com - Empire for Euphoria
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
