OpenEuphoria

RE: Use of Source Forge for win32lib

• Posted by Matt Lewis <matthewwalkerlewis at yahoo.com> Jun 23, 2003
• 421 views

> From: Derek Parnell [mailto:ddparnell at bigpond.com]

> a number of people have said that sourceforge is too slow to 
> be useful. I want to know if there is any interest in using
> SourceForge as a primary or even secondary project place for
> the win32lib project.
> 
> If there is no real interest, I'll have the current SourceForge site 
> decommisioned.
> 
> If the site's performance is reasonable, it has better bug tracking, 
> support, and enhancement request functions than what I'm using now.
> 
>   http://sourceforge.net/projects/win32libex/

I think it would be a good thing if sourceforge were used again (of course,
I started the site, so maybe I'm biased :), since the bug tracking could
prove to be especially useful, and it could also be a good way to spread the
burden of maintenance and upgrading from your shoulders.  Assuming it
continues, we should probably create an actual homepage so that users don't
have to wade through the summary pages.

Looking at the releases, you seem to have put the v.59.1 release in 'Hidden'
mode, rather than 'Active'--it doesn't show up in the list of files
available to download.  (When in Admin mode, go to 'File Releases' and see
the list of packages at the bottom of the screen.) Was this on purpose?

Matt Lewis