OpenEuphoria

RE: Use of Source Forge for win32lib

• Posted by Al Getz <Xaxo at aol.com> Jun 23, 2003
• 423 views

Derek Parnell wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> a number of people have said that sourceforge is too slow to be useful. 
> I 
> want to know if there is any interest in using SourceForge as a primary 
> or 
> even secondary project place for the win32lib project.
> 
> If there is no real interest, I'll have the current SourceForge site 
> decommisioned.
> 
> If the site's performance is reasonable, it has better bug tracking, 
> support, and enhancement request functions than what I'm using now.
> 
>   http://sourceforge.net/projects/win32libex/
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> cheers,
> Derek Parnell
> 
When you say it's too slow, you mean it takes too long to
download because they cant supply the demand of bytes/second?

Last time i downloaded a copy, i think i got it directly from
your site (?) and it was quite fast and getting to it was very
straightforward, so why not use that?

What do you mean about S.F. having better functions exactly?
What is it that makes it seem better?

Take care for now,
Al