Re: Structures...
>First of all, Euphoria DOESN'T need structures, it is a performance
>killer, and i'm gonna start to whine if we keep talkin about
>structures...
Performance killer ? Hello ?
Its cuts down *all* overhead of a sequence .versus. integer/atom.
>The only reason I like euphoria is its straightforwardness... Now, we
>add structures, and it will become like C/C++ w/ sequences, or pretty
>damn close...
If any other person is going to start using such arguments, im going to bang
my head against the wall. Hello? This is EUPHORIA, not C.
Here are a couple of multiple choice questions:
What is most important in making a programming language ?
a) That its a good, practical language
b) That its not C.
Are structures unique to C or were they added to C, because they were so
helpfull in other languages ?
a) True
b) False
Do you have some sort of emotional disorder, which makes you want to compare
everything to C, problaly due to some tragic experience with C ?
a) Yes, thats the reason I can't shut up about C!
b) No, I just make this statement about C, because here on the list
everybody is against C, and this way I'll be liked.
c) No, I dont like structures on itself, and C has got nothing to do with
it.
What letter comes after A and B in the Alphabet ?
a) G
b) C
c) respectively B and C
Do you actually have some experience programming C which you base your
judgement about C on ? And do you consider C to be the same as a feature 99%
of all languages have: structures or at least so much the same, such an
argument in actually of _any_ (?) meaning in the discussion ?
a) Yes
b) No
Ralf
nieuwen at xs4all.nl
-- And no, this is not a flame.
-- This is me getting sharper, when I have to repeat myself, because
everybody keeps starting the discussion up over and over again, *instead* of
going against any arguments given. If this offended any one... oh well.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
