OpenEuphoria

Re: data analysis

• Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> Jan 17, 2001
• 480 views

On 17 Jan 2001, at 14:02, Kat wrote:

> On 17 Jan 2001, at 0:55, Kat wrote:
>
> > David and Graeme, all i can say is wow, and thanks. David's presentation of
> > the data is going to be easier to use first, but in the following test,
> > David's didn't resync properly, and i think cause it is it trying to resync
> > always on s2. In Sweigsdunka vs Zweigsdanka, it sync'd and  found "weigsd",
> > but then didn't resync properly on the "nka". It took the first 'a' from
> > Zweigsdanka and went looking for it in Sweigsdunka, not finding it untill
> > the end of the word. It thereby missed the common "nka". Swaping the words
> > around didn't help David's code's results at all, but messed up Graeme's
> > code's results in a new way. Is it possible to force which word is the
> > primary sync in your code, David, in a way i can spec while it's running?
> > Mostly, i'd be looking for the result with the fewest number of differences.
> > /me is still studying the code....
>
> Changing MaxGap to 2 made it resync faster, but i'm not sure yet that
> passing maxgap to diff() along with the words is the right answer yet..

Ok, passing different MaxGaps to diff() gets results, now to see if i can
change MaxGap every time sync is lost.....

Kat