Re: Anxiety over 4.0
- Posted by Arthur Crump <arthur.crump at ntlwo?l?.com> Jun 11, 2008
- 723 views
Jeremy Cowgar wrote: > > CChris wrote: > > > > > > So don't worry, forward refs will ver likely make their way, but probably > > for > > 4.1 - unless Jeremy wishes to take a bit more time. > > > > The thing about taking more time is we have a whole feature list that could > take the next year to implement. Which are features that we should take more > time on and which are not? I think it's important that we get any features in > 4.0 that may break someone's code as to not have a break in 4.0, then another > in 4.1, yet another in 4.2, etc... > > We have to have a freeze date sometime or we will be here next year talking > about one more feature. > > -- > Jeremy Cowgar > <a href="http://jeremy.cowgar.com">http://jeremy.cowgar.com</a> Could some potential keywords be added to 4.0? Words which are likely to become keywords in a later version but which are not yet implemented? This would mean that more code could be broken in 4.0 but a lot less later. Arthur Crump, (no website)