Forward References (was: Re: Anxiety over 4.0)
- Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at ?ahoo.c?m> Jun 11, 2008
- 641 views
CChris wrote: > There was hardly any discussion on the dev list that it should not be added. See, this is where our philosophies differ. I say "why add it" and you say "why not". So, why forward references? And another question, are we talking about doing away with declare before use entirely or just reintroducing the routine_id() "bug" from a couple of years ago? Because while I can support the second item (and that shouldn't be too hard to reintroduce anyway, right?) I'm completely baffled by the idea of doing away with declare before use. So what problem would forward references solve that the current Euphoria include system (with 4.0 improvements) doesn't solve? -- A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. --John Gall's 15th law of Systemantics. "Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming." --C.A.R. Hoare j.