Re: without monthly_check
On Fri, 05 Jan 2001, Robert Craig wrote:
>> Cense writes:
>>
>> > Now i must say that i agree with MTS here, I dont think
>> > that this would be too hard to implement, would it not Robert?
>> > If and not, it would attract a lot of more commercial industry to
>> > Euphoria but that may not be what you want, Rob. I personally
>> > vote in favour of Rob adding this to his list of things todo.
>>
>> As usual, MTS's figures are pulled from thin air,
>> with nothing to back them up.
>> Removal of subscript checks, uninitialized variable
>> checks etc. from the interpreter would not save 30%
>> or anything close to it.
I never said his figures did not come out of thin air, i dont usually believe
MTS's claims about speed. But i just figured that what he resquested would be
easy enough to implement and mostlikely will add *some* speed. No big deal
right?
>> If you need the ultimate in speed, use the Translator.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rob Craig
>> Rapid Deployment Software
>> http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
--
evil, corruption and bad taste
^[cense]
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
