Re: getOpenFileName Bug???
- Posted by Dan Moyer <DANIELMOYER at prodigy.net> Aug 27, 2002
- 399 views
Kat, Maybe this isn't relevant to how you'd be using those 12,379 files, but it would seem at first glance that selecting from that many files by hand would be...inefficient? Dan Moyer ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kat" <gertie at PELL.NET> To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com> Subject: Re: getOpenFileName Bug??? > > On 28 Aug 2002, at 7:00, Derek Parnell wrote: > > > > > Brian is correct. The original routine only catered for a single path/file > > name to be returned. When it was updated to support multiple files names, > > the buffer size was not changed. I'll increase it 8000 bytes. This should do for > > nearly all cases. > > > I have a folder with 12,379 files in it. Any chance you can accomodate that? > > Kat > > > >