Re: getOpenFileName Bug???

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Kat,

Maybe this isn't relevant to how you'd be using those 12,379 files, but it
would seem at first glance that selecting from that many files by hand would
be...inefficient?

Dan Moyer

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kat" <gertie at PELL.NET>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Subject: Re: getOpenFileName Bug???


>
> On 28 Aug 2002, at 7:00, Derek Parnell wrote:
>
> >
> > Brian is correct. The original routine only catered for a single
path/file
> > name to be returned. When it was updated to support multiple files
names,
> > the buffer size was not changed. I'll increase it 8000 bytes. This
should do for
> > nearly all cases.
>
>
> I have a folder with 12,379 files in it. Any chance you can accomodate
that?
>
> Kat
>
>
>
>

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu