Re: Ken's abrasiveness
c.k.lester wrote:
>
> Kat wrote:
> > c.k.lester wrote:
> > > You were reaching. But what was your point?
> > Does it really even matter what my point was?
>
> Yes, because lying is not socially appropriate. Distorting facts is frowned
> upon (unless you're a politician).
Yes, it is, so where did i promise to go away like you said?
> > Eu doesn't have a string type, there is no string in Eu. They are sequences,
>
> Okay, so let's call it repeat_seq() I guess.
>
> > where every 8bit character takes up 32bits. And you are adding a function
> > that
> > replaces 3 whole lines of code that do the same thing,
>
> Well, using for...end for only replaces 3 lines of while...end while. So
> repeat_seq() is in good company.
>
> > a trivial thing, while important stuff doesn't get added.
>
> By "important stuff" you really mean, "stuff Kat wants."
No. I mean like unicode, case/switch, strings, a current thread of unicode and
accented chars which is on the list, all the keywords that really mean "goto"
unlabeled places, real debuggers, windoze/wx/etc gui debuggers like ooeu has,
forward/backward referencing, etc etc. So unless you really have a fascination
with my arse that you'd like to detail, would you get off it, CK? Why must you
distort everything like that? Are you a politician?
> From what I can see, 4.0 is getting a few changes and bug fixes. It's
> called progress, and while it might not be at a pace you appreciate,
> it's still stepping forward.
It sure is a step forward. And I can't contribute because my code is carp. And
if i goto jail for simply existing, it would have been my last chance to make any
positive difference at all anywhere. And while you and others use strtok or eunet
or eubot, my code in them is said to be carp and unuseable.
Kat
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
