OpenEuphoria

Re: Nested routines

• Posted by Jeremy Cowgar <jeremy at ?owg?r.com> May 28, 2008
• 620 views

ken mortenson wrote:
>  
> Two questions.  Same answer.  Because less is more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> 

I agree! Less code I type the better.

> Imagine how effecient and less complicated your compiler becomes when you
> remove all the unneccessary bells and whistles and just leave the pure and
> clean, unadulterated core.  Bells and whistles are for libraries (which are
> optional in a project) while the core should be a finely crafted tool.  It's
> one of the main things that attracted me to the language in the first place.

Imagine how efficient and less complicated your code will be (which you have to
maintain, not the compiler) if the compiler does it's job and provides the common
constructs/functionality necessary for me to do my job (programming) easily!
That's what I look for. If I wanted a bare minimum compiler I'd go with
whitespace or something.

--
Jeremy Cowgar
http://jeremy.cowgar.com