Re: Nested routines
Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
> Have you ever used a language that supports nested routines? I suspect that
> it's much like the for-in loop. Sure, you can program with out it, but once
> you use it, you'll miss it.
>
> One could ask, what can be done with a for-in loop that couldn't be done w/a
> simple for loop? The answer is easy... nothing! But why use a for loop if you
> have access to a for-in loop and your iterating a sequence?
Two questions. Same answer. Because less is more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Imagine how effecient and less complicated your compiler becomes when you
remove all the unneccessary bells and whistles and just leave the pure and
clean, unadulterated core. Bells and whistles are for libraries (which are
optional in a project) while the core should be a finely crafted tool. It's
one of the main things that attracted me to the language in the first place.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
