Re: Current implementation of exp() is faulty.
- Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at yahoo.c??> May 21, 2008
- 761 views
CChris wrote: > > Jason Gade wrote: > > > > Right. And what I was trying to say was that converting from double to > > string > > to double again loses information. Better to do one conversion and compare > > apples > > to apples. > > > > I think that CChris is talking about an arbitrary precision library. > > The parsercan return any nmber of bits in exact mode. Otherwise, it returns > as many bits as the number of digits provided allows in a safe way. Never mind. Either you are agreeing with me and I just don't see it, or no matter how simply I try and explain you are missing it. I thought that we had already resolved the issue. -- A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. --John Gall's 15th law of Systemantics. "Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming." --C.A.R. Hoare j.