OpenEuphoria

Re: Another namespace addition for 4.0?

• Posted by "Euler German" <eulerg at gmail.com> Apr 25, 2008
• 670 views

> On 25 Apr 2008 at 11:15, CChris wrote (maybe snipped):

> 
> 
> posted by: CChris <christian.cuvier at a?riculture.gouv.fr>
> 
-<snip>-
 
> So I'd consider : as not bad. Perhaps @ could be better, although it
> would be more natural then to write <symbol> at <namespace>.
> 
I was about to suggest that "@" but then realize it's even worse than 
":" to type in. I liked the dot idea but it's a common specifier for 
OO bound languages. So, my vote goes to the colon if we can't take 
the dot. ;^)

Best,
Euler

-- 
_
_| euler f german
_| sete lagoas, mg, brazil
_| efgerman{AT}gmail{DOT}com
_| -----------------------------
_| Reply preferably to the list,
_| or to the address above. Thx!