Re: Another namespace addition for 4.0?
- Posted by c.k.lester <euphoric at ckl??ter.com> Apr 25, 2008
- 658 views
CChris wrote: > . smacks of object oriented programming, and you know the baleful fate of > heretics > to the dogma of procedural programming here... I'm among those heretics. I like the way the . looks better than the :, so I would vote for the .. It doesn't have to mean object-oriented. But my IDE is very handy for when I start typing include datetime.e as dt my_var = dt. and a drop-down list pops up of available datetime functions. That's cool. Or would be. Could be.