RE: logs and antilogs
- Posted by Kat <kat at kogeijin.com> Oct 30, 2002
- 478 views
On 30 Oct 2002, at 14:38, Christian.CUVIER at agriculture.gouv.fr wrote: > > > > Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:21:53 -0600 > > From: Kat <kat at kogeijin.com> > > Subject: RE: logs and antilogs (to Kat) > > > > ..... Besides, i hate to ask the > > > computer for a math answer, and get something like 2.99999999 when i > > > know the answer is 3. > > > > > > Kat > > If you don't give a clue to computer about the kind of result you need, > is it expected to guess? I think that's definitely a good AI problem, > isn't it? Well, not really. An Ai would tend to be fuzzy about the decision point, unreliable in the repeatabilty of the answer,, not good. > BTW: did any CPU manufacturer fully implement MMIX specs yet? The #E > (epsilon) special register could be of some use in reducing these > annoying meanless decimals. MMX2's DAZ flag doesn't solve it all, far > from that.. I have no clue. > Good math software attempt to implement some form of cleverness, but > far from perfect, and they are so expensive... I am guessing some rounding is going on somewhere. Kat