OpenEuphoria

Re: bignum progress report

• Posted by Christian.CUVIER at agriculture.gouv.fr Oct 29, 2002
• 394 views

Yes, I know, but I'm not sure how the 16-bit thing will be handled by
Linux/Win32. It was reasonably optimized for my 386/33 (I didn't releae
this at the time), probably not adequate now. Further, it extensively
uses direct stack manipulation; I wouldn't try this in ring 3 app's...
	How can I get an address for an Euphoria variable inside an ASM routine
I call()? Ok, I know, I can first poke() whatever data I need and call()
the code following this data. Isn't there a better way?

	Have a nice day!

	CChris

> 
> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 02:09:26 +0000
> From: Bernie Ryan <xotron at bluefrognet.net>
> Subject: RE: bignum progress report
> 
> 
> Christian.CUVIER at agriculture.gouv.fr wrote:
> > 
> >       Hi the list!
> >       I had coded routines in 16-bit assembler for big numbers long ago (I
> > still think asm is best for really serious number crunching);
> 
> Chris:
> 
>   Why don't you dig it out and use it in Euphoria.
>   You know that you can use assembler in Euphoria, don't you.
> 
> Bernie
> 
>