Re[2]: IPC
- Posted by "Thomas Parslow (PatRat)" <tom at almostobsolete.net> Oct 13, 2002
- 356 views
<snip> > One other small point I noticed was that it appears that if you > change a procedure to a function, you kindof need to reboot the > machine to get ipc working properly again. No biggie, really. > Of course it could have been an error on my part as I made run.exw an > invisible process & if that had got stuck running in the background > somehow, that would explain why it kept on insisting on using > WM_CALLPROC instead of FUNC. There's nothing in ipc.ew that would make a reboot necessary, it is probably todo with the program still running in the background. Try checking the return value of ipc_SetProcessName(), it will return 0 if the process is already running... > Pete Thomas Parslow (PatRat) E-Mail/Jabber: tom at almostobsolete.net ICQ: 26359483